![]() įor instance, the CDROM interface uses the standard USBSTOR.SYS USB mass storage device driver you can browse the. It was specifically designed in order to use standard, Microsoft provided, preinstalled drivers, thus enabling users to use the device without having to install a device driver. The Blackdog unit provides neither drivers nor the. ![]() This would cause the behavior you describe, but would still put the problem in Black Dog's court. Not exactly earth-shattering.Įrr, this page would seem to disagree with your assertions: ĭriver INF files (supplied by the vendor) can force a reboot using the Reboot=, Restart= or certain flags for the Copyfiles= directives. It's a shame too, because a 400MHz PPC would be a rocking embedded platform, if only it could do something.Īn example use: When my brother is visiting and wants to blab to people on AIM and I don't want him installing that crap on my box. But that's stretching things transparently thin. I guess it would be ok in a situation where you want to run gaim but the person who owns the machine won't let you install AIM (because they hate it, not because you're unable to install it, you need to be an Admin you know!). Without at least being a USB host, there is no point to this thing, because it can't talk to anything except the much more capable computer you already own, or at least are allowed Admin access on. What's the real utility of that? I can run Firefox on my Windows machine, or on my Blackdog. It looks like it's only really good for running apps that your computer could already run, only the display is in your XP command window, or a remote X server, which I assume is one of the things installed. Now, this BlackDog thing is something different entirely. Using an enet based rabbit or gumstix and some solder, you could set up a web based inventory manager, that would email someone when X number of products were sold out, or when X items are at 10% or less (Like our printers do for paper and toner. Because of the shape of the lobby, you can't see the machines from the check out desk (it's a library) and so the machines will occasionally sit (somewhat) empty, until someone tells a staff member or the person responsible checks them. ![]() People hit these things like rabbid wolves, but the person responsible for filling them works upstairs, and is rarely in the lobby. No one is trying to build a modular PDA kit yet (though it would be neat to see one).Īn example use: We've got a pop and snack machine in our lobby. What they're not for, is running firefox or whatever other desktop apps you've got lying around. Granted, I'd personally prefer a Connex or Robostix base with a real ethernet module hooked up instead of the waysmall, but it's in that same vein. You build an image for it, hook it up, and that's the end of the story. It's like a RabbitCore from Rabbit Semiconductor. The Gumstix is excellent for little embedded things where you will never see the machine or any "UI" from it. I think these are interesting, totally unrelated devices. I found that it wasn't, for reasons I explain in the article. The BD says it's to take on the road and plug-n-play. I tried to review the products in comparison to what they're sold as. The Waysmall is hardly for research engineers, unless you think it requires an engineering degree to use a Linux command line.įurthermore, if, as you argue, the BD and the WS are rather different products, why would a performance comparison be of interest? I don't think I explicitly compared one to the other. You're quite right, they really are two different types of If you'd like I can do a performance test of lynx on the 200MHz and Firefox on the 400MHz, since that would really tell a lot. AGAIN, the Waysmall does not have an X interface, so I couldn't run Firefox on it. I didn't do any performance testing, since the Waysmall is an XScale 200MHz, and the BD is a PPC 400MHz. This largely amounts to the installation portion, but also includes the window shown every time you plug in the BD. The parts that are actually custom to the BD, and not just rehashing of GPL software, have some serious UI flaws. Am I wrong? Because it seems the Black Dog got judged by a different criteria than the Waysmall and vice versa it wasn't apples to apples testing. It just seems like these are two different products because if I understand correct the Black Dog can log in just like the Waysmall using a terminal it just trys to act like a personal server where the Waysmall is comfortable just being a small computer for research engineers. What about performance? Did you do any performance testing between the two servers because that would be very useful if you performance tested Firefox on both for us? SO it's not the UI just the install that you didn't like.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |